
When I checked again today it seems that this post was wisely removed from Digby’s Twitter page. This debacle raises some interesting questions on morality and its extremes and the dangers of sharing too much on Twitter and other social media networks (check out this Allhiphop article on how Twitter can end your career.) On one hand you can’t deny that accusations of Digby being a jerk & horrible business partner are nothing compared to Varg’s sins, but does that justify a prominent label head posting a link to download an album not on his label? He could have voiced his opinion without posting a link to the album, and it isn’t his place to “punish” Varg. As bad a person as Varg Vikernes is he’s paid his debt to society in his country’s eyes, and instead of merely speaking against this man Digby inadvertently advocated illegal filesharing as well. Not too smart for someone who makes a living selling music.
I remember reading Napalm Death singer Barney Greenway’s accounts of Digby Pearson’s bad business practices in the book “Choosing Death: The Improbable History of Death Metal & Grindcore” and it’s been widely known that he isn’t alone in his view of the Earache label head. My official stance is I condemn both men’s above-mentioned actions, but I’d like to know what ya’ll think. Does the severity of Burzum's crimes and racist views justify the actions of Digby Pearson? What about your views of filesharing in general? I would think that even the people that illegally download music can see that it's inherently wrong. Feel free to discuss and comment, and check out these links to more people that hate Digby:
The Haunted singer condemns Earache then recounts his accusations
Elitist Records head slams Earache
Bolt Thrower Condemns Earache Reissue
No comments:
Post a Comment